Top News

Aave User Swaps 50 Million USDT, Gets Only 324 AAVE

A user tried to swap $50 million USDT for AAVE on the Aave interface but ended up receiving only 324 AAVE tokens due to massive slippage.
Rajpalsinh ParmarRajpalsinh Parmar
Written by Rajpalsinh Parmar
Harsh ChauhanHarsh Chauhan
Fact checked by Harsh Chauhan

Last Updated Apr 17, 2026, 06:44 UTC

Aave User Swaps 50 Million USDT, Gets Only 324 AAVE

✓ CryptoNewsZ distinguishes factual reporting from commentary and opinion to help readers understand the nature of the content they are reading.

✓ CryptoNewsZ follows a rigorous Editorial Policy that prioritizes factual accuracy, reliable sourcing, thorough verification, and proper attribution of quotes and media.

✓ Our journalist team ensures that cryptocurrency news and analysis are supported by reliable evidence, relevant context, and careful editorial review.

✓ We follow a comprehensive Review Methodology to evaluate exchanges, reviews, and tools using consistent criteria, thorough research, and transparent assessment practices.

Key Highlights

  • A user tried to swap $50 million USDT for AAVE on the Aave interface but ended up receiving only 324 tokens due to massive slippage.
  • The platform has clearly warned about extreme slippage, but the user still confirmed the transaction on the mobile device
  • DeFi protocol will return $600,000 in fees collected from the swap as a goodwill gesture

In the strange incident that took place on the Aave protocol today, a DeFi user executed a massive swap on the Aave protocol, where the user converted approximately $50 million in USDT into only 324 AAVE tokens, which are worth around $36,000 at the current market price. This transaction was executed even after receiving a clear warning of extreme slippage. 

User Ignored Aave’s Explicit Warning

The incident has taken place on the official Aave interface, which integrates with CoW Swap routers for efficient order execution. According to Aave founder and CEO Stani Kulechov, the unusual type of big single order triggered a standard warning, where the platform gives a clear alert about potentially “extraordinary slippage” due to insufficient liquidity for such a large trade, which requires the user to check a confirmation box to proceed.

Despite this warning, the user accepted the warning and confirmed the transaction, which was operating from a mobile device.

Aave Incident

(Source: Etherscan)

Blockchain data on Etherscan confirms that the swap went through without any apparent technical failure on the protocol side. CoW Swap’s routing mechanism operated as designed by following established industry standards for handling big trades.

However, the lack of deep liquidity in the relevant pools allowed MEV bots and arbitrageurs to capture the vast majority of the value, which, combined with the user’s acceptance of unlimited or extreme slippage tolerance. This has effectively turned the trade into one of the most expensive user errors seen in DeFi to date. 

In the post on X, Kulechov stated that the transaction could not have been completed without the user’s explicit confirmation of the warning. He said, “Events like this do occur in DeFi, but the scale of this transaction was significantly larger than what is typically seen in the space.”

Aave has shown a commendable gesture for the affected user by stating that the team will attempt to make contact and has committed to returning approximately $600,000 in fees collected from the swap as a goodwill gesture. 

“The key takeaway is that while DeFi should remain open and permissionless, allowing users to perform transactions freely, there are additional guardrails the industry can build to better protect users. Our team will be investigating ways to improve these safeguards going forward,” Kulechov said.

This is not the first incident, as DeFi’s permissionless nature has led to many high-level slippage incidents in the past, where users mistakenly executed large trades in low-liquidity pools. 

In 2024, a Uniswap trader lost approximately $700,000 after setting improper slippage tolerance on a large swap. Due to this, an MEV bot which front-run the order exploited the misconfiguration for massive arbitrage. 

Another major case involved a Dogwifhat buyer on Solana who spent around $9 million in early 2024 but suffered $5.7 million in losses due to extreme slippage in a small memecoin pool, with the token price crashing after the trade. 

In November 2025, a Cardano holder swapped 14.4 million ADA, which was worth around $6.9 million, for the illiquid USDA stablecoin. This has triggered massive slippage and received only about $850,000.

Also Read: Grayscale Launches Avalanche ETF GAVA Amid AVAX Price Dip

Rajpalsinh ParmarRajpalsinh Parmar
Written By Rajpalsinh Parmar

Rajpalsinh Parmar is a Crypto Journalist at CryptoNewsZ with over three years of experience. His work is so well-regarded that it has been cited in a Cambridge University research paper. Rajpalsinh is an expert in crypto trading bots and blockchain tech. He also covers major industry events and hackathons. He is a hands-on user who tests trading tools to see how they work in the real market. Rajpalsinh loves making hard topics easy to understand. He gives readers the facts they need to stay ahead in the world of digital assets.

Harsh ChauhanHarsh Chauhan
Fact Checked By Harsh Chauhan

Harsh Chauhan is a Senior News Editor at CryptoNewsZ. He has spent years reporting on the digital economy. He focused on DeFi, NFTs, AI, and digital asset developments. Harsh has a BBA in Marketing and a Blockchain Foundation certification. He does more than just share news. He uses on-chain data to explain Bitcoin ETFs and tokenized assets. Harsh is also a hands-on user. He has been staking and trading NFTs since 2021. His work helps readers understand a complex market with simple, data-backed facts.

Our Standards and Commitments

Investment disclaimer

CryptoNewsZ publishes cryptocurrency and financial news for informational and educational purposes only. Our content is not investment advice or a recommendation to trade. Crypto markets carry significant risks, so readers should conduct their own research before investing. Read our Investment Disclaimer for details.

Ad Disclosure 

CryptoNewsZ is committed to transparency, clearly identifying advertising, sponsored content, and promotional material where applicable. Commercial relationships do not constitute independent editorial endorsements. Visit our Advertise page to learn more.

Editorial Policy

CryptoNewsZ follows editorial standards that prioritize accuracy, credible sources, and accountability. We aim to correct material errors and distinguish factual reporting from opinion. Read our Editorial Policy to learn more about our newsroom practices.

More to read

Latest news

Stay updated

Follow CryptoNewsZ on Google News for breaking crypto stories.

Newsletter