What to Know:
Akshat Vaidhya lost nearly half of his $100K investment in Pantera’s Early-Stage Token Fund.
He criticized early-stage crypto VC funds for high fees, poor deal quality, and oversizing.
Maelstrom, co-founded with Arthur Hayes, is now focusing on cash-flowing, off-chain crypto businesses.
An eyebrow-raising admission from Maelstrom co-founder Akshat Vaidya reveals how one early-stage crypto investment turned into a painful lesson in fees and fund size. Vaidya says his personal investment of $100,000 in the Pantera Capital Early-Stage Token Fund fell to around $56,000 over four years despite a booming crypto market.
In an X post, Vaidya pointed to high fees and poor scale as key issues. He wrote, “My $100K, vaporized into $56K within 4 years (3% mgmt + 30% carry) by this Early-Stage Token Fund. During those 4 years, BTC 2x’d and numerous seed deals did 20-75x. Yet this fund charged fees to erase half of LP capital.” His question was how, even in a good cycle, the structure of many early-stage crypto funds left their investors worse off.
What really Happened?
Vaidya put money into a token fund run by Pantera. Over the next four years, the broader crypto market did well and Bitcoin roughly doubled in that time. Many early-stage deals reportedly returned 20x to 75x for their backers. Yet his slice lost nearly half its value. He pins much of the blame on the fund’s fee structure: roughly 3 % annual management fee plus a 30 % performance fee on the upside. That combination squeezed the returns and in this case erased them.
Vaidya argues this isn’t just his bad luck it points to a broader trend in crypto venture investing. He says many early-stage crypto venture funds have grown too big, meaning they must invest in weaker deals simply because they need to deploy large pools of capital. Many VCs Lose access to the most promising opportunities when they scale up too fast. Hence, they charge high fees that eat into any upside even when some deals succeed. His takeaway is how investors or LPs deserve better opportunities ones where capital can deploy “at scale” but without suffering high drag from fees or losing the ability to back genuine breakout winners.
What Maelstrom is Doing Differently
Vaidya laid out earlier last month how his own firm is taking a different path. With former BitMEX head Arthur Hayes, Maelstrom is launching a new vehicle, Maelstrom Equity Fund I, L.P. that focuses on cash-flowing, off-chain crypto businesses instead of token-only early ventures.
According to Maelstrom They target “picks and shovels”-type businesses in infrastructure rather than speculative tokens. They also aim to give founders clean exits, rather than locking them into long token/stock unlocks. They want to enable institutional investors to deploy large sums (nine-figure sums mentioned) into crypto-native opportunities while avoiding the risk and drag of early-stage token funds. In short, they believe the future lies in real business models in crypto not just hoping a token will 20x overnight.
Final Thoughts
If you’re an investor or someone tracking how crypto is evolving, here are some key lessons:
- Even in a booming market, high fees matter. If your fund charges large management and performance fees, your upside has to be very large to overcome them.
- Fund size matters: larger funds may struggle to find enough high-quality deals, especially in a niche like early-stage crypto.
- Consider the type of exposure: token funds can offer big upside but also big risk and drag. Funds focused on real businesses might offer more stable returns.
- Always ask: How aligned are the fund managers with my interest? Are the fee structures fair? Is the strategy sustainable?
In the words of Akshat Vaidya: “Most early-stage crypto funds grew too big for the tiny pond of real winners. LPs deserve better opportunities to deploy at scale … early-stage crypto just isn’t it.”
Whether you’re investing directly in crypto or considering funds that allocate into it, this episode is a clear reminder that structure and scale matter as much as market timing.
Also Read: Bitcoin Price Reaches Make-or-Break Zone After October’s 3.5% Retreat
