- Gemini has been sued by its shareholders.
- Investors say that the firm hid internal turmoil and a major pivot while promoting strong growth.
- Gemini shares plunged more than 80%.
Gemini, the prominent cryptocurrency platform that was co-founded by the Winklevoss brothers, has been sued in a high-stakes securities class-action lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed on March 18 in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The lawsuit accuses the company of painting an overly rosy picture of its business during its 2025 IPO and beyond, and downplaying brewing internal turmoil.
The Lawsuit at a Glance
The lawsuit is targeting Gemini and Key executives, including the twin brothers, Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, for alleged violations of U.S. securities laws. Investors who bought shares during September 12, 2025, and February 17, 2026, are the proposed class. They are seeking unspecified damages to recoup losses that are tied to a brutal shock plunge.
Plaintiffs claim that Gemini’s IPO prospectus and follow-up filings hypes its core trading operations and global ambitions, glossing over the risk of a major strategic shift. No early warnings were given of possible layoffs, market retreats, or even executive exits. They argue that missteps that allegedly inflated share prices before reality hit.
What Unfolded: From IPO Highs to Strategic Shock
Gemini exchange went public on Nasdaq in September 2025, closing its debut day at $32 per share amid crypto market optimism. The offering documents spotlighted growth in monthly active traders and plans to conquer international markets like the UK, EU, and Australia.
Fast-forward to early February 2026, where Gemini dropped a big bomb by sharing a roadmap for Gemini 2.0. The firm announced a sharp pivot toward prediction markets, platforms where users can trade on the outcome of real-world events like elections or sports, as a new growth engine.
With this market, the exchange moves away from its exchange-focused model, signalling that the company is now looking beyond traditional crypto trading to drive future expansion. Plaintiffs argue that this change highlights risks in its core business that were never clearly communicated before.
Compounding the shift, Gemini axed 25% of its staff, pulled out of those key overseas regions, and saw a wave of C-suite departures. The CFO, COO, and chief legal officer all left, signalling deep operational cracks.
As of now, their exchange has not made any comments regarding the lawsuit.
Why the Suit? Claims of Deception and Omission
At its core, the lawsuit alleges material omission and falsehood. Gemini allegedly overstated the staying power of its trading revenue while secretly prepping a business model overhaul. The prediction market bet plaintiffs contend, upended the very foundations investors bought into.
Critics point to the filings’ emphasis on “expanding our international footprint” as misleading, given the later withdrawals. Executive churn and mass layoffs further paint a picture of undisclosed distress, eroding trust in Gemini’s disclosure.
In the volatile crypto sector, such lapses could breach Section 11 of the Securities Act (for IPO docs) and Section 10 (b) of the Exchange Act.
Stock Repercussion: An 80 Wipeout
The fallout has been sharp. From its $32 debut, shares plunged over 80% to $6.01, reflecting investor exit after the pivot and user drop. Trading volume surged following the announcements, worsening the decline. Early investors now face steep paper losses, adding momentum to the class-action push.
This echoes post-IPO struggles seen across crypto, including Coinbase, though Gemini’s reversal stands out for its scale.
This lawsuit highlights the risks of unclear disclosures, with its next moves set to decide investor trust and future growth.
Also Read: Ethereum Supply Crunch Builds as Exchange Reserves Hit Historic Low
